The first 100 days of a new presidential administration has been used as a milepost to take measure of a new president and how things are being handled. I see no reason not to apply the same standard to The Anointed One even as the Main Stream Media Obama-press scramble desperately poo-poo such an subjective measure of one who can not be measured on any human scale.
When the B. Hussein administration crashes and burns, and it will, political scientists/talking-heads can trace its demise to its first hundred days. How can I say that it will crash and burn when his approval ratings are so high? Simple. All who were hoodwinked into voting for such a untested, inexperienced novitiate are in denial and are, at present, unable to admit buyer's remorse.
Underlying this superficial and unjustified support, B. Hussein's specific polices run afoul of the very deeply felt convictions of American voters. For example, the most recent Rasmussen Poll asked voters if they wanted an economic system of complete free enterprise or preferred more government involvement in managing the economy. by 77% to 19%, they voted against a government role. That is up seven points from last month!
As B. Hussein's daily line changes from "I inherited this mess" to "There are faint signs of light," the clock starts ticking. If there is no recovery in six months, and I do not think there will be, Americans will come to the conclusion that he and his policies are the problem and not the solution. Especially when his policies really kick in: higher taxes, a 50% hike in utility bills (cap and trade) nationalizing the financial system and closing down the auto companies.
Therefore, it is my conclusion, in light of the polls, that B. Hussein's first 100 days can be summed up thus: He has done many wrong and harmful things, but he has done them extremely well!
